Authors: Romano Cl, Drago L, Logoluso N.
IstitutoOrtopedicoIrccsGaleazzi , Milan, Italy
Title: Low-Dose Gentamicin-Loaded Spacers are Effective for Two-Stage Revision
Background: Peri-prosthetic infection is among the most common reason for revision in the USA and in Europe. Two-stage revision with antibiotic-loaded spacers is the golden standard option with an eradication rate >90%. High antibiotic concentration (>2%) and the association of more than one antibiotic in the spacer are proposed by different authors in limited series of patients.
Hypothesis/Purpose: Are high antibiotic concentrations and antibiotic associations necessary for interim spacers in routine two-stage revision surgery?
Methods: A systematic review of published papers on two-stage revision of infected total hip and knee arthroplasty, treated with the routine use of an industrial low-dose (1.9%) gentamicin-loaded preformed spacer has been performed. Inclusion criteria were: papers published in peer-reviewed journal from year 1995 to present, reporting the infection eradication rate of two-stage hip or knee joint prosthesis with the use of an industrial preformed low-dose gentamicin spacer (Spacer G or Spacer K, Tecres SpA, Italy). Exclusion criteria were: case reports, clinical series with <10 patients, duplicate studies, mean follow-up < 24 months.
Results: 24 papers were retrieved, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria (Table 1), for a total of 491 spacers implanted in 10 centers (7 Europe, 2 North America, 1 Oceania). 19 patients (3.9%) had an infection recurrence /persistence that required spacer exchange or a resection arthroplasty. Of the 480 patients that underwent the second stage procedure, 25 (5.2%) had an infection recurrence/persistence at an average follow-up of 46 months.
Discussion: The relatively heterogeneous material available notwithstanding, this systematic review provides evidence in favor of the routine use of an industrially preformed spacer, loaded with a standardized relatively low-concentration of gentamicin only, that in different centers showed an average infection eradication rate of 96.1% at spacer removal and of 94.8% at the latest follow-up after reimplantation.
Conclusion: This systematic review does not support the hypothesis that antibiotic associations or antibiotic concentrations higher that 1.9% are routinely needed for spacers used in two-stage revision surgery.